Liberal theory | Marxist |
origin of state: social contract. created by man (mechanistic) function of state: minimal/night watchman welfare state
nature of state: unbiased treat everybody equal
| critic of liberal origin: no contract but for subjugation of weak. function: coercion nature: instrument of capitalist class
|
Marxist |
Instrumentalists | Structuralist |
Marx, Lenin, Ralph Miliband book: Communist Manifesto state: instrument of capitalist class marx: state is executive committee (implements order) of capitalist class
base and superstructure model state exist <=> classes exist Lenin: state represent irreconciability of class-antagonism in capitalist society, represent dictatorship of minority, in socialist society, represent dictatorship of majority
| state is also structure relative autonomy: not complete instrument sometimes may not act as instrument Marx: 18th Brunaire of Lois Bonaparte: gave the theory of relative autonomy bonapartism: executive is strongest arm of govt Marx: when more than one dominant class (feudal, capitalist), state becomes equilibrium maker. state bargains with different groups. near to liberal theory of non-bias state not complete neutral since in crisis stage will support rich
|
Ralph Miliband Instrumentalist nature of state in post-capitalist societies laisses faire- original capitalism
post capitalism: welfare state BooK; the nature of state in capitalist societies Obj: impact of welfare state result: no change inequitable distribution of wealth =>concentration of wealth=> elites (bureaucracy, judiciary)=>decision for rich
Managerial revolution: James Burnham decision making by mangers (any one can become) so not necessarily for capitalists Miliband: manager also rich only
| Poulantzas : Structuralist book: Political power and Social class welfare state: relative autonomous universal adult franchise: voting power to masses so each party has something for all class
relative autonomy= favour rich in crisis competitive political parties: so for each section
Althusser: interpellation ideological state apparatus, so no resistance
|
Neo-liberal state Hayek, Friedman, Nozick
|
|
Post-colonial state |
third world countries suffering from neo-colonialism: Kwame Nkruma (father of Ghana) colonialism: unequal exchange: 3rd world countries go for autonomous development colony= dependency (like bacteria makes human a colony, benefit enormously, not equal exchange) development of underdevelopment of of peripheries (prosperity of core)
|
|
Nature of post colonial states |
Modernist: WB economist | Marxist |
integration of post-colonial with world economy
FW Riggs: Prismatic societies: society in transition (traditional to modern) modern; state specialisation features of prismatic: (earlier fused, now somewhat separated functions formalism ( theory equal practice ), poly-communalism (many communities, not a nation) poly normativism (following norms by making laws), functional overlapping, (army=civilian) attainment norms, (birth) economic system (bazar-canteen), administrative system (SALA model- nepotism), heterogenity (modern+traditional)
Gunnar Myrdal book: Asian Drama india= soft state (don't punish) due to corruption, gandhi (law breaker), culture (respect for law-breaker)
result of soft state lawlessness, corruption
even Pt. nehru could not enforce land reforms Ambedkar: grammar of Anarchy = soft state
| Instrumentalist- dependency theories given by scholars of Latin America and Africa AG frank , Emmanuel Wallerstein , Samir Amin core and periphery interlinked due to globalisation core (advanced) and periphery model: development of underdevelopment periphery are instrument in hands of core countries
solution: 3rd world solidarity- delink from international economy core countries are instrument of their bourgeoise class
Structural: Hamza Alvi south asia: particularly Pak overdeveloped state not to look by instrumentalist approach since state not instrument of bourgeoise in these countries
west: economic development= state development 3rd world - mismatch in development economy: traditional, state- modern( not instrument of any class) (most powerful) as a result, Bonapartism colonial legacy: powerful bureaucracy to control
continued because leaders continued state led development (executive powerful)- concentration of wealth in hand of executive and civil servants
|
Pluralists theory of state | Feminist theory |
Robert Dahl: polyarchy (different from pluralist theory of sovereignty)
| study power (patriarchy) instead of state Catherine Mckinnon : state is male there is no feminist theory of state when i look at state, state appears male to me
personal is political state is instrument of patriarchy
Iris Marian Young : differentiated citizenship affirmative action in favour of women
ambivalent view exploiter only way to solve
|
Comments
Post a Comment