REGIONALISM IN INDIA
Introduction
- huge size of india, so regional politics is natural
- politics of identity
- geographical+ social cultural identity
- regional movement may become sub-national movement and challenge territorial integrity
- Gurharpal Singh: core-periphery model
- regional movements from border is cause of concern, not from core
- types of regional movements
- cessesionist movement: ULFA in Assam, Kashmir, khalistan, Nagas
- statehood: Gorkhaland, Bodoland
- greater regional autonomy: when centre-state ruling party different
- Bhoomi-putra movement: shivsena, Asom gana parishad
- linguistic: tamil sub-nationalism,
- federalism in constitution is to accomodate regionalism
- indian federalism is called holding together model
Reasons for regionalism
- Modernisation theory:
- Rudolf and Rudolf: when democracy is introduced in traditional society, people will go for identity politics
- culture of poverty or scarcity:
- Marc Jurgensmear: regionalism in north east
- culture of affluence
- Thomas Januzzi: state of punjab khalistan movement
- Uneven development
- Robert Hardgrane
- Telangana, Vidarbha
- Son of soil theory
- Myran Winner
- Shiv sena
- Politics of opposition
- Prof. Iqbal Narain
- just for opposition
- Sanjeeb Baruah: our identity as bengali is centuries old, identity as indian is 70 years old
- Paul Brass: nationalism is short term trend, regionalism is permanent in indian politics
- there are external factors also
Good or Bad
- Threat
- territorial in expression
- Dr Prerna Singh: book- How solidarity works for welfare: sub-nationalism and social development in india
- southern states had regional movements and they had more bargaining power
- so got more development in comparison to UP, Bihar
Record of Govt in Dealing
- better than other developing countries and some advanced countries
- except Kashmir, other movements don't threaten territorial integrity
- managing kashmir is difficult due to excessive involvement of external factors due to its strategic importance
- flaws in New Delhi policy of not implementing art 370 in letter and spirit
- govt's policy on regionalism
- no formal policy
- trends observed
- govt ready to accept any out-of-box solution
- asymmetrical federalism allows for this but within constitutional limits
- govt is ready for talks but no force is accepted
- usual pattern is to offer political, economic packages
- Atul Kohli: regional movement show inverted U curve.
- movement arise, reaches to peak, then fades
- peak depends on amount of public support
- to deal with them
- democracy is reason, democracy has solution for regional movements
- co-opting people in decision making, by devolving more power
- Prof. MP Singh: need to strengthen panchayati raj system
- Sarkariya Commission: strengthening of local-self govt
- Gandhi also supported village republic to control such diversity
- regional movement is crisis of development, not crisis of nation building
- balanced regional development, inclusive growth, cooperative federalism is important measure
- Ambedkar: interest of nation over party
Role of Ethnicity
- since end of cold war, ethnic movements have strengthened
- Horrowitz: research on ethnic issues have become core issue in social science
- ethnicity: sort of collective consciousness due to common descent, language, religion, history
- ethnicity is core of nation, although there can be multi-ethnic nations. eg- US, India
- monoethnic nations are natural, multi-ethnic are political nations
- built through compromises like federalism, secularism, welfare state
- indian model is salad bowl: different yet together
- US is melting pot: all look alike, can't be differentiated
- James Manor- book: Ethnic politics in India
- 4 ways to define ethnicity in india
- religion
- language
- race
- caste
- SD Muni: ethnicity is not challenge to territorial integrity
- identity is not constant of indian, can be changed by political class as per convinience
Reasons for ethnic politics in india
- co-existence of modernity and tradition
- Rudolf and Rudolph, Atul Kohli, Rajni Kothari
- when democracy in traditional society, basis of mobilisation is ethnic
- Charles Taylor (Communitarian)
- assertion of marginalised communities
- Neera Chadoke:
- attempts by state to homogenise people
- Prof SD Muni: not choice of people but preference of political parties
- Prof. Deepankar Gupta: not a popular passion but preference of elites in india
Democracy and Ethnicity
- Atul Kohli: art- can democracies accommodate ethnic challenges
- democracy in traditional society lead to mobilization on ethnic lines
- ethnic challenges if not dealt properly can create threat to territorial integrity
- democracy is factor causing problem, but it is the only solution
- he appreciated Nehru's handling of Tamil nationalism which has subsided cessesionist trend permanently
- appreciates handling of crisis in Assam and Mizoram by Rajeev Gandhi
- critical of Indira's handling of Punjab
- preferred force in place of accommodation
- handled democratically only when
- leaders at centre are democratic
- position of party at centre is strong
- Sarkariya Commission: ethnic movements are never fully ethnic, there is political and economic aspiration also.
- democratic decentralisation is the way forward.
Comments
Post a Comment